|
March 18, 2004
''I do not know how I can conceive the good, if I withdraw the pleasures of taste, withdraw the pleasures of love, withdraw the pleasures of hearing, and withdraw the pleasurable emotions caused by the sight of a beautiful form.''A sensuous person such as myself agrees easily to this. There is much in a surface look at Epicurus that delights. But then there is the deeper look. Epicurus believed that ataraxia (peace of mind) is attained when the mind is no more under the influences of desires. Unlike the Stoics, who seek ataraxia by destroying the passions which disturb the soul, such as fear, greed, grief and joy, the Epicureans seek to eliminate the desires by giving into them:
''He who understands the limits of life knows that it is easy to obtain that which removes the pain of want and makes the whole of life complete and perfect. Thus he has no longer any need of things which are troublesome to attain.''On the surface, this seems simple and happy. However, is 'ataraxia' the most exalted state? Is 'freedom from mental disturbance' {Gk. ataraxia [ataraxia]} the very most for which we can hope? Or is there more to life? Does a 'raging discontent' inspire us to action more than a pacified mind? What IS 'the most exalted state'? Wouldn't it be that which inspires us to action, that which goads us into the 'willed conscious evolution' that takes us beyond the simple consciousness of animals? For it is only in this striving that we can approach the divine. If we want to chew our cud with the cows, we can, but we are of the minds that can ask 'Why?'. Should we not do so? Shouldn't we strive and be discontent and know unhappiness, so that in this knowledge and pursuit of action, we should then thereby find a greater happiness? All great invention was not brought about by contentment, but by a sense that something was deeply wrong and needed fixing. The calm tranquillized meditator may take to his pillow in times of discontent, while the man of action is out there fixing the broken wheel so that he can get somewhere. Which will do humankind the more good in the long run? Meditate only so long as to obtain the energy for action. It is a necessary pause in the pace of life, but it is not the end goal. If you think the pillow is the goal, then you are sleeping and while you dream, a thousand doers shall dance by you with their great strength of limbs. Do you want to dream of the dancers or do you want to get up off the cushion and join them? These are the two approachs to life. One leads to easy contentment and one leads to irritating discontent. But the grain of sand which so irritates the oyster is what causes him to produce the pearl. Can we learn to live with our discontent and love it? It is a question I have asked of myself:
© JAL: |