Forward...That necklace HAS finally seen materialization!
January 4, 2003 - C
"Jewelry's Finish!"
I believe the reddish brown stones I'd bought back then are JASPER and not carnelian, which was my first guess. I was, however, correct in my thought that I might alter the original design before the piece was assembled. Indeed I did, for I forgoed the use of the gold beads I'd originally bought for the agate varieties I bought today, so that nothing could tarnish and make it appear aged. THREE and a half YEARS in the waiting!
As it so often happens in the online journal world, one doesn't HAVE to read the newspapers. Anything of any GREAT significance is bound to be reported by some fellow keyboard pounder such as myself.
January 5, 2003 - A
"Aliens And Immortality"
Thus it was this morning, I read in two different journals of the ''world's second cloned baby'' born ''Friday to a Dutch woman.'' Of course, everyone views this with great suspicion, for the organization claiming responsibility won't even let them do a DNA test on the supposed first closed baby. Clonaid, established by the Raelian movement, further declares four more cloned babies will be born by the end of January.
The Raelian movement is a religious group that believes aliens landed on Earth 25,000 years ago and started the human race through cloning. No doubt, it's just a bunch of woo woo loonies.
But anyone with two cents worth of sense is bound to not take them seriously. 'Cloning For Immortality' is a bizarre idea, at best. To think that one could make an exact copy of one's genetic self and it's going to be a YOU that will outlive you, well, people have tried a variation of this through the standard human mode of replication. But one's children, EVEN CLONED REPLICAS, will be their own persons, with their own experiences, AND NOT THE PARENT. At worst, it's a sick idea. There are better ways to attempt immortality.
At least they aren't promising trips on spaceships via 'magic pudding'.
I, of course, keep wishing my Michael would materialize and give me the 'bright, happy' (NOT 'DARK') gift of immortality. Barring that, I COULD accept offers from an alterate world, from an ARMAND, LESTAT, MARIUS or MAHARET. But those vamps have an unfortunate characteristic of passing out 'for dead' when the sun rises and not coming to until sunset. If they're not locked in and safe, they're vulnerable and could be in trouble. So I'd rather it be from MICHAEL.
But as the years go by, one might not be so picky.
There's at least one similarity between MY vampirian mode and the RAELEANS. I 'believe' the cause of their immortality to be a gift from aliens. There are lively little beings within the vampire's blood that maintain all their cells, remaking some to fit the new host beings' needs, and giving them their special powers.
I have not yet explained it in the Vampire Tale, but have come up with a logical explanation for the fatal sensitivity to sun, as well. The original planet with the original host beings had a dying sun. The sensitivity to the sun, like all the other vampiric alterations, was a positive mutation so that they could make better use of its dimming qualities. However, the new hosts on planet Earth find this alteration a bit less than positive.
Unless, of course, like LESTAT, they are EXTREMELY powerful, and only wind up with an amber tan that makes them pass better for human. Yes, all of Lestat's angst, and he only wound up with a tan!
Still, in the main, this inconvenience has helped to prevent what happened in the old home world. Nearly every possible host had been already taken, and few were being born for new occupation. It had become an old, boring world, where nothing ever changed. The blood beings that have migrated to Earth don't want this to happen again. Reproduction will happen slowly and carefully. For, as they can only passively experience the world through their hosts eyes, they do not want the host, and thus themselves, to get bored for very long!
Cry, beloved passions! Cry while I am still alive to cry and feel the intensity of it! Oh, at the end of Tale Of The Body Thief, Lestat cried when he'd brought David into his world, and David was not mad at him. Together, they'd be, and he'd not be alone. For a little while, he had this comfort.
January 5, 2003 - B
"A Dream Of Passion"
And that he could enjoy now the full delights of his life, never dreaming falsely of the old one, centuries ago. And PASSION! How I love that the WRITER, Anne Rice, has captured it, and knows passion!
How I love the MIND, from which all these things spring! And then I cry, remembering LAURA, for no other mortal I've met in the flesh evinced so much PASSION! She'd try to tell me of it, that it was what we needed in our lives.
I, still of the shy words and hesitent understanding, didn't fully realize. I still may not ever fully understand. It may be only a great cresting wave in my mind, that remains mostly there, that does not see print, that does not see its way pushed out of vocal chords and into other actions. I still toy at it cautiously, at times.
But that it explodes in my mind, with full technicolor, it does, and I can only hope to fully actualize it. Do we ever? Ah, but the AUTHOR of this fine book actualizes it in every book she writes. It comes to life, it is transformed from the entrapment within a mind no one sees.
Can I do that? I hope to, I toy at it, get some vague fuzzy dabblings of it that might approximate it here in print. But do I REALLY get at it? Do I really tear this excellent thing from my own solitary self and transform it?
Or am I only JUST BEGINNING to understand what true power is, and how I might achieve it? Reason, the observer which attempts to be objective, tells me this is the case. I am only at the perilous stage of BEGINNING. If I let illusion or ego or anything else, timidity, 'humility', any FALSEHOOD sway me the least, I will not achieve it.
It will derail from the path it COULD have. And this is the only triumph: THAT I TRULY KNOW IT COULD BE.
And how I pray it SHALL be.
Low, but noisy heat sounds permeate the air. The warmth floats towards me, a welcome recipient. I am up with a sore back. I reclined much yesterday, while I read Rice's wonderful words, and now the back says, ''OW! Too much horizontal!''
January 6, 2003 - A
"Writing And Salvation"
The imaged strains of UGO FARELL singing ''Pavane For A Dead Princess'' go through my mind. I play his CD often. He must have must another by now. But, oh, the perfection of his young, passionate voice on the first CD. Oh, there we are, again, PASSION. Around and about and through, I turn to those things expressing its purity.
And, again, I share one more quote of one artist advising another:
Only those who come to literature as they might to religion have what it takes to really become writers. --Mario Vargas Llosa, "Letters to a Young Novelist"
Ah, there's so many levels of interpretation for those words. Come to writing, as the seeker seeking Knowledge, Revelation, Transcendance, Salvation, YES! Come to writing, taking your rational mind along, evaluating with the cool outside eye what might become otherwise disordered illusion.
Come to it freely, with all your heart, seeking the sweetness you know it has to offer. Come to it with a joyful heart, gratefully accepting the revelations that first appear in your solitary chapel of soul. Come to it with a quiet understanding others may not take to the things that make you rant so, with such fevered devotion.
Come to it, sharing your revelations, freely, but of a happy humility, not with ego's demands. Say, I have been blessed! Seek not to draw converts, like the tiresome leechs that annoy people everywhere. Let SPIRIT draw those who would find your revelations. Know you are part of Something BIGGER than yourself.
But no sad diminuation of Self exists there, for you are grateful for your own Divine Spark. And, oh, to see it in others, to cherish their visions and revelations, oh, gifts of the Spirit truly, that, too, has a religious fervor. They share their Holy Water, and I drink. Was I supposed to drink? Is that what people do with Holy Water? But I DRINK, with the thirstiness of the vampire. Yet I hope to give something of my OWN in return.
''See, here, as you drink, see my visions,'' I would tempt the innocent. And are we all innocent, and have we but merely to learn it? Yes, this must then be our saving salvation.
GET JESUS OFF THE CROSS! It was supposed to only be for three days anyway. Suffering comes, but it passes. Is that not, too, a lesson of the ages? A lesson from those aged and wise, passed down through time. I hear it. Do you?
While beginning a biography of Anne Rice (What? You say, you strongly notice a TREND?) , I all of a sudden found myself strongly missing LAURA. What was it? Is it the beginning of the bio, in which Anne's parents are described, remembering how Laura describes her ancestors in HER bio. It could well be.
January 6, 2003 - B
"Best Not To Count On It"
The sensation of missing Laura is quite strong. I was curious as to what she'd think of my recent entries. I wrote this morning's entry in a great fit of religious passion, passion like unto that of the saints. I was certain it was inspired and belonged in the Essential Joan, but the rational part of my mind said ''WAIT! You will know later whether or not it is what you feel it to be now.''
I knew that was true. Nearly every book of advice for writers advises getting some distance between the heat of creation's moment to a later time for best evaluation. The more time passes, the more objectivity we can possess.
It did not take long. Just a day at the roaring sewing machine, pushing passive fabric through it, was enough. I read the one from last night and thought, oh this is GREAT. I'm getting at something here. The YEARNING really comes through.
Then I proceeded to the entry which I'd felt so inspired. I felt very little when reading it. It's not BAD, it's trying to reach some grand concepts, it's just not . . . It's just not coming across to the reader, I think. One can be all in a bliss with a religious experience, and it's there in your head, and maybe geniuses can get such a thing out and digestible by their readers, but I don't think it's commonly possible.
It might be part of the reason Laura was so suspicious of religious experience. She decried the vague and undescribable. ''Tell me what this 'Divine Spirit' is like that you sense. Describe it in concrete words!'' I'd HATE such moments. I'd shuffle in the chair, and squirm while I stammered, praying Laura soon find some OTHER subject.
I think the advice I created for myself in the earlier entry is best: ''If I let illusion or ego or anything else, timidity, 'humility', any FALSEHOOD sway me the least, I will not achieve . . .'' my writing goals.
Now the skeptic would say of religious passion that it is illusionary, but I won't go that far. What is it about the YEARNING for passion that has a concrete feel to it? It is an emotion large and definitive. There seems nothing vague to it. With describing the religious experience, your readers have to be smoking the same 'wacky tabaccky' that you are to fully follow you. They must be having the experience themselves, in other words.
Sometimes this works and it's cool. But it's best not to count on it.
Yesterday was . . . I shall not describe yesterday in much detail, save to say it was filled with tummy stress, and groaning pain while sitting on the 'porcelain throne'. And THAT was probably too much detail at that!
January 8, 2003 - A
"Hopefully Better"
Needless to say, in that state, I turned briefly to the MUSE and she said, ''NADA, DON'T BADA!'' So I didn't bother and hope today will be better.
If you can forgive another quote, really, though it amused me, it bears some relation to the last entry:
Whether you are an innocent beginner or seasoned adept, you must show some spirit! Don’t vainly memorize other people’s sayings: a little bit of reality is better than a lot of illusion. Otherwise you’ll just go on deceiving yourself. --Yunmen (864-949)
Yes, BEFORE I'd seen his saying, I was hoping to 'show some spirit'. I do have faith today would be better than yesterday.
Back when I was a junior in high school, I played a cockney in the school operetta, My Fair Lady, which features cockney Eliza Dolittle who gets reformed by professor Henry Higgins. In one of the early scenes, I, in my patched tatters, admired the beautiful finish of a hem on a wealthy well-dressed woman as she passed by me.
January 8, 2003 - B
"Touching The Hem Of Fame"
I briefly touched the hem of the lady, who could have been famous in her world.
But I can't imagine this kind of fame. Mr Blackwood, the FASHION JUDGE of the world, has seen fit to pronounce judgment on a certain author who's works have receiving my attention lately. Yes, right up there with Anna Nicole Smith and Princess Anne, my favorite author, dear Anne Rice was singled out for his barbs.
Personally, ''a cross between Queen Victoria and the Vampire Lestat!'' sounds rather lovely to me. But what does a poor pedestrian person like me know? Actually quite a lot, if you ask ME! Just don't ask Blackwell.
Still for all of her fame, and all of my non-fame, there may be a brief brushing of our fates, however remote. Reading her bio, there is a minor bit player who sounds very much like a minor bit player (actually not quite so minor) in LAURA's bio.
Read now, the description of when Anne and Stan got married:
''Anne wore a blue brocade shirtwaist dress with long sleeves and a flared skirt, size five. Stan wore a suit. The JP was a one-legged Baptist who walked with a crutch and held a Bible in his free hand. He was warm and open, enjoying the unusual setting.
The wedding party stood in front of a large fireplace, and the Ritters silently prayed that the occasional scorpion that came down the chimney would not show its face.''
from PRISM OF THE NIGHT, by Katherine Ramsland
Now read the description of a man who'd helped Laura get her first job, many years ago.
''I also met One-Legged Johnny at Lamson Business College. Johnny was Jan's friend. He was tall, 6'2'', skinny, with a movie villain's narrow, pockmarked face. His reputation was as nasty as his appearance. Whether due to his missing leg or because he was plain ornery I didn't know, but he could be one hateful bastard. Leastwise, if the stories about him were true. I was used to a father who was a hateful bastard, so I liked him anyway. Johnny, however, hated me. He came from Texas and we were always ragging each other about our home states. He'd say things like, ``Texas is still paying sales tax for Pennsylvania.'' I'd quip in return, ``Texas is fish dung washed up from the Gulf of Mexico.'' I thought we were joking, good clean fun, and assumed he thought the same . . .'' ''. . . After that Johnny and I became stout friends. He trusted me as he had never trusted anyone. That's what he said and I believed him. It was One-legged-Johnny who was instrumental in getting me my first decent job, a NCR 3000 operator at the Valley National Bank. A NCR 3000 is a bookkeeping machine designed to do ledgers and statements on checks and deposits. When I was hired Emil Schuster, the supervisor, informed me I had an exceptional friend in Johnny. The only reason I had been hired was because Johnny wouldn't stop badgering him.''
from IN THE ARMS OF A RAINBOW, by Laura Lansberry
I wasn't able to find it in her bio, but Laura had said many times, when telling tales of the past, that Johnny reformed his past criminal ways even further and returned to Texas to become a Baptist preacher! Anne and Stan got married in Texas, in 1961, which was about four years after Laura got her first job.
Now how many one legged Baptist preachers in Texas could there have been in 1961?
I say their JP and Laura's friend were very likely one and the same!
![]()
© Joan Lansberry