May 28, 1998
Julia survived her first night of work. She is sleeping now.
We have the room darkened and are using the air purifier which
also serves as white noise maker. She needs her sleep very
much, but when she has had sufficient rest, Julia awakens with the cutest smile on her
face.
May 29, 1998
The Transcendent Question: Is This Literary Ordeal Going to be
Worth My Effort?
So asks Peter Vokac on today's Community Front Page. It's the
question of many timid art lovers who forage out into the world
of culture. So often the modern sensibilities are lacking, and
much of what's acclaimed is tedious at best. Twenty years ago, I
questioned the things that were put before us in a Modern Art
History class. Assemblages of garbage, tawdry or even ugly, were
presented as things to be appreciated. The only thing to be said
for such items, is anything in the real world looks artistic
after looking at them...the cracks in the sidewalk, the pattern
of smudges on your front door, anything! Virtue by
contrast may have some
eye-opening aesthetic, but does little to serve the cause of
art.
I asked the teacher the purpose of all this. He said the
raison d'etre of modern art was to make you question what
art was. This left me rather unsettled. Left to our own
intuition, we know what Art is. It must be beautiful and
powerful in its communication. There must be rhythm, balance,
harmony. There must be depth. There should be a hint of the
deep underlying issues of what it means to be human, in a truly
great work of art. It communicates "the universal", as Ms
Cameron says. Art may explore painful truths, but always the
essential dignity of humanity should never be threatened. It is
a hatred of humankind to do otherwise. The 'artist' says all is
ugly and insane. Perhaps that is that individual 'artists'
truth. But it is not universal truth.
The news item that provoked this discussion concerns events at
the Tucson Poetry Festival.
"No charges will be filed against a Tucson poet who invited
the Vail Middle School choir to sing during a poetry reading
parents called sexually explicit.
Pima County Attorney Barbara LaWall announced yesterday that
'Ann Nominus' did not violate decency laws during a poetry reading
that involved children at the annual Tucson Poetry Festival April
3."
The Arizona Daily Star published her poem, ``[name deleted]'' so readers could determine its worth for
themselves. It was a long, rambling disjointed incoherent piece
that was hardly pornographic. The veiled references to sex were
tamer than anything vividly portrayed on prime-time TV. It,
however, was painfully bad, and the students left halfway through
its reading, before singing the song
'Nominus' had invited them to
sing. Some parents made a issue of it and called it pornographic
because they needed a label to put on it. You can't sue someone
for BAD poetry. Bad poets have a right to publish their work.
(Note of August 2002: I've changed the poet's name to 'anonymous', per her request.)
But the choir director should have seen the poetry first. Peter
Vokac had this to say:
A clear case of Terminal Boredom, not suitable for
children.
Well kids, now you know what modern poetry is. It's like seeing
the world through the wrong end of a telescope with
someone else's eyes. You may or may not catch something you
recognize, but whatever you may
grasp, you will have to work hard for every scrap. The
transcendent question: Is this literary ordeal going to be worth
my effort?
. . . Modern poetry, like modern music, is written by modern
poets for other modern poets.
|
Goddess, save us from "modernity"!

May 29, 1998
James came home from work yesterday having heard and reporting
unsettling news. Would there be war in South Asia? Two
weeks ago, India conducted five underground nuclear explosions,
despite disapproval from other countries. Their long-time bitter
rival, Pakistan, felt they had to assert their strength against
India, and Thursday, also detonated an equal number of bombs.
Fearful for what the future holds, I've been reading the news
wires to learn of progress. The Associated Press reported the two
nations are stepping away from nuclear abyss, as "Pakistan
proposed yesterday that both it and India sign the Comprehensive
Test Ban Treaty, while India suggested a mutual pledge not to
strike first."
Still, so much damage has been done already. Both India and
Pakistan are poor countries, yet their leaders spent billions of
dollars for this display of muscle. Their people could little
afford this. In Pakistan more than seventy percent of the
population remains illiterate. Disease and malnutrition run
rampart in these countries in which basic amenities as
electricity and clean drinking water are a struggle to obtain.
Many nations have joined in economic sanctions against the
countries, which may add further to the poverty. Also, what harm
have been done to their environment by all this nuclear testing?
The immeasurable costs will even be felt on our peaceful
shores.
later this day...

We take the shapes and details of familiar objects for granted.
Day after day, I've spent possibly thousands of hours sitting
before
my sewing machine., but had never
really looked at it. This afternoon's quiet drawing become a
meditation of discovery.
June 4, 1998
"Be patient toward all that is unsolved in your heart and try to
love the questions themselves like locked rooms and like books
that
are written in a very foreign tongue. Do not now seek the
answers, which cannot be given you because you would not be able
to live
them. And the point is to live everything. Live the questions
now. Perhaps then you will gradually, without noticing it, live
along some distant day into the answer."
------------------Rainer Maria Rilke
But I am at those locked rooms with my eye to the keyhole,
and ever restless. Patience is not easy.
June 5, 1998